Debt Relief Bailout
At what point will the “poor” be held accountable for their actions of poverty?
We, meaning the tax payers, not the people who pay taxes and get a refund for more then they paid, but the actual tax payers, at what point do we get relief from funding all of these failed social programs that do nothing but create more dependents of the tax payer, thus govt bureaucracies get to continue to buy vote with our money?
If you do drugs no money
If you have a kid while on assistance no money
if you do not actively seek work, no money or it runs out in one year
if you can not keep your “home” clean and undamaged, no free or subsidized housing
if you buy unhealthy food no food stamps
If the govt can regulate CEO pay and force businesses to do the bidding of the govt then why not people who get “bailout funds” which is what welfare is.
If any of you use the Veterans that are injured during action get a life they are owed a debt from us.
Sky: Bohoo hoo for you. How is your problem my responsibility financially?
in many ways, they already are. After all, they’re po’
you might want to rethink some of your ideas though. While they sound laudable on the one hand, on the other:
drug screening – big brother/big government
no kids – hello, China
clean home – yikes, big brother is peeking in my windows
unhealthy food – more big bro to make sure you clean your plate. Who determines what is healthy and what isn’t. Who is checking to make sure only healthy food is purchased. Does that mean the kids (that were born before receiving assistance) can’t have a twinkie in their brown bag lunch.
in general, all those ideas decrease freedom and personal liberty. Your ideas could also apply to those on SS disability. They might be disabled but to what degree is the disability due to their actions, inactions, and/or negligence. Instead, you could just feel warm and fuzzy inside knowing that some of your taxes are helping people and this could very easily be a non-partisan issue so “vote-buying” would not come up.